![idatabase to bento idatabase to bento](https://crumbtrail.org/wp-content/uploads/qlzksa8mqhu/compartiempo-la-campa-a-que-busca-concientizar-sobre-la-importancia.jpg)
Why did Apple start over with Final Cut? Because 99% of the music industry uses ProTools and they couldn't get anywhere with it. I use Evernote every day, and it's a great utility, but it's nothing like FileMaker, unless you know nothing about Filemaker and use it as a flat-file. Saying that is like saying that ProTools should be rewritten to work like GarageBand, and that would be simply nutty. FileMaker goes far beyond a spreadsheet or a word-processor. Why would anyone want to "split the Windows guys off?" One of the strengths of FileMaker for my clients is that I develop once and deploy to both platforms with very little concern about who's going to use it, other than some font oddities on the Windows platform. Plug-ins are one of the many things about FileMaker that make it extensible, flexible and not limited like some dim competitors (Access comes to mind). Second, why is it problematic to use plugins for syncing calendar and address book? If you were familiar with FileMaker you'd know that there are plugins for a vast array of uses, from PHP to SQL to credit-card processing, better dialog control, and on and on and on. Having just gone to the FileMaker Developer's Conference, I can tell you that they are their own entity, separate both physically and intellectually from Apple Inc.
#Idatabase to bento pro
If Apple was willing to irritate broadcast pros using Final Cut for three whole years to start over with clean code, why are we still labouring with a half-baked Filemaker Pro in 2013?įileMaker is NOT Apple it's owned by Apple but it's not MANAGED by Apple. The need for Windows compatibility has really killed the potential innovation Filemaker could have brought to the platform. The Filemaker-team-in-a-silo approach hasn't really done anything for the platform.Įxactly.
#Idatabase to bento mac
The Mac still lacks a marquee Project Management app, and Mac-based salespeople are still learning to live with Daylite's flaws. While Filemaker dithered in its little separate silo, Evernote and Basecamp ate its lunch. Would have been much better than going the Bento route. Then rebuild the Mac app into a 100% no-holds-barred iWork worthy database product. Split the Windows guys off into a "totally separate development team" and let them continue to build a Windows version. IMO, instead of Bento, what Apple should have done was embrace, extend and then extinguish Filemaker Pro. But asking an app made by Apple to access my Contacts and Calendar only by using third-party plugins is problematic. No one is arguing that Filemaker isn't a powerful piece of software. It's a 100% company owned subsidiary.Īnd the fact that " There is no cross-pollination going on there." is precisely the problem.